🔗 Share this article

In my role as a Dungeon Master, I traditionally steered clear of extensive use of chance during my Dungeons & Dragons adventures. I tended was for narrative flow and what happened in a game to be shaped by deliberate decisions rather than pure luck. Recently, I opted to alter my method, and I'm incredibly glad I did.

The Catalyst: Seeing a Custom Mechanic

A popular streamed game showcases a DM who regularly asks for "fate rolls" from the participants. This involves picking a specific dice and defining consequences based on the number. It's at its core no distinct from using a random table, these get invented on the spot when a player's action has no predetermined conclusion.

I chose to experiment with this approach at my own session, primarily because it looked engaging and provided a break from my usual habits. The results were fantastic, prompting me to think deeply about the ongoing balance between planning and randomization in a D&D campaign.

An Emotional Story Beat

At a session, my players had survived a massive fight. Afterwards, a cleric character wondered if two beloved NPCs—a sibling duo—had survived. Rather than picking a fate, I handed it over to chance. I instructed the player to roll a d20. The stakes were: a low roll, both were killed; a middling roll, a single one would die; a high roll, they both lived.

The die came up a 4. This triggered a deeply emotional moment where the party found the bodies of their companions, still clasped together in their final moments. The cleric conducted last rites, which was especially meaningful due to previous roleplaying. In a concluding reward, I decided that the remains were miraculously transformed, containing a spell-storing object. I randomized, the item's contained spell was exactly what the group lacked to address another critical story problem. One just script such magical story beats.

Sharpening On-the-Spot Skills

This experience made me wonder if randomization and spontaneity are actually the beating heart of tabletop RPGs. Even if you are a meticulously planning DM, your improvisation muscles may atrophy. Groups reliably take delight in ignoring the best constructed plans. Therefore, a good DM needs to be able to pivot effectively and create details in the moment.

Utilizing on-the-spot randomization is a fantastic way to train these skills without venturing too far outside your preparation. The trick is to apply them for minor circumstances that won't drastically alter the overarching story. To illustrate, I would avoid using it to determine if the main villain is a traitor. However, I would consider using it to determine whether the party reach a location right after a major incident unfolds.

Enhancing Player Agency

Luck rolls also works to keep players engaged and cultivate the impression that the game world is responsive, shaping based on their choices as they play. It reduces the feeling that they are merely actors in a DM's sole script, thereby strengthening the collaborative aspect of storytelling.

This philosophy has historically been part of the original design. Early editions were filled with encounter generators, which made sense for a playstyle focused on dungeon crawling. While current D&D often prioritizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, that may not be the only path.

Achieving the Sweet Spot

There is absolutely no problem with being prepared. However, equally valid nothing wrong with letting go and allowing the dice to guide minor details instead of you. Control is a major part of a DM's job. We use it to facilitate play, yet we can be reluctant to give some up, even when doing so can lead to great moments.

My final suggestion is this: Do not fear of letting go of control. Try a little improvisation for inconsequential details. The result could discover that the organic story beat is far more powerful than anything you might have scripted by yourself.